Literature on Phylogenetic Nomenclature

P. Cantino and K. de Queiroz

Publications dealing with phylogenetic nomenclature. More information about the list

 

News Reports and Overviews

Formative Early Publications

Other Publications on the Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Nomenclature

Phylogenetic Nomenclature of Species

Other Applications of Phylogenetic Nomenclature

Critiques of Phylogenetic Nomenclature

• Replies to Critiques

Replies to Critiques

BERTRAND, Y. and F. PLEIJEL. 2003. Nomenclature phylogénétique: une reponse. Bull. Soc. Fr. Syst. 29: 25-28.
BRYANT, H. N., and P. D. CANTINO. 2002. A review of criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature: is taxonomic freedom the fundamental issue? Biol. Rev. 77: 39-55.
CANTINO, P. D. 2000. Phylogenetic nomenclature: addressing some concerns. Taxon 49: 85-93.
CANTINO, P. D. 2004. Classifying species versus naming clades. Taxon 53: 795-798.
DE QUEIROZ, K. 1995. The definitions of species and clade names: A reply to Ghiselin. Biol. Phil. 10: 223-228.
DE QUEIROZ, K. 1997. Misunderstandings about the phylogenetic approach to biological nomenclature: a reply to Lidén and Oxelman. Zool. Scr. 26: 67-70.
DE QUEIROZ, K. 2000. The definitions of taxon names: a reply to Stuessy. Taxon 49:533-536.
DE QUEIROZ, K. 2006. The PhyloCode and the distinction between taxonomy and nomenclature. Syst. Biol. 55: 160-162.
DE QUEIROZ, K., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2011. Phylogenetic nomenclature, three-taxon statements, and unnecessary name changes. Systematic Biology 60: 887–892.
DE QUEIROZ, K., and P. D. CANTINO. 2001. Phylogenetic nomenclature and the PhyloCode. Bull. Zool. Nom. 58: 254-271.
DE QUEIROZ, K., and P. D. CANTINO. 2001. Taxon names, not taxa, are defined. Taxon 50: 821-826.
DONOGHUE, M. J. and J. A. GAUTHIER. 2004. Implementing the PhyloCode. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 281-282.
HILLIS, D. M. 2007. Constraints in naming parts of the tree of life. Molec. Phyl. Evol. 42: 331-338.
LAURIN, M. 2005. Dites oui au PhyloCode. Bull. Soc. Fr. Syst. 34: 25-31.
LAURIN, M., K. DE QUEIROZ, and P. D. CANTINO. 2006. Sense and stability of taxon names. Zool. Scr. 35: 113-114.
LAURIN, M., K. DE QUEIROZ, P. CANTINO, N. CELLINESE, and R. OLMSTEAD. 2005. The PhyloCode, types, ranks, and monophyly: a response to Pickett. Cladistics 21: 605-607.
LEE, M. S. Y. 1996. The phylogenetic approach to biological taxonomy: practical aspects. Zool. Scr. 25: 187-190.
LEE, M. S. Y. 2001. On recent arguments for phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon 50: 175-180.
LEE, M. S. Y., and A. SKINNER. 2007. Stability, ranks, and the PhyloCode. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 52: 643-650.
SCHANDER, C. 1998. Types, emendations and names -- a reply to Lidén et al. Taxon 47: 401-406.

Previous

 

NEWS

– 16 Nov. 2011 –

A proposal to amend the PhyloCode with respect to species has been posted.
More information ->

– 6 Sep. 2011 –

Kevin de Queiroz reports on the progress of the PhyloCode Companion Volume.
Read the report (pdf 33 KB)->

A revised version of the PhyloCode (version 4c), approved by the CPN in December 2009, was recently posted at www.phylocode.org.
More information ->

Archived news items right arrow